1440p 144hz would be a good balance. I currently have a 42” 1080 HD TV that is almot 10 years old. 4k or 3840 x 2160 = 8,294,400 pixels per frame, at 60hz or fps you are rendering around 497,664,000 pixels per second. 2. It's not only about the Hz. input lag and response time (of the tv / monitor) is more important since this game is capped at 60hz. 8K subscribers in the Reviews community. For example: a classic movie (24p) viewed on a Chromecast (60hz) plugged into a television (120hz) The reason I bring this up is that on rtings, it shows that most 60hz TVs can only show judder free 24p from native 24p sources, not things like chromecast/game consoles. It is nicer for 60fps content though. If your currently using 60hz the jump to 60hz to 240hz is a much bigger difference than the jump from 60hz to 144hz. Since only a handful of games will have 120 fps support this really isn’t as big of a deal as many make it seem. The second one I have been…. It’s not massive difference but noticeable. Huge difference when comparing side by side. Been playing call of duty in the living room where my 60 hz tv is but literally 3 days ago, I moved the PlayStation to the bedroom cause my girlfriend watches Disney shows downstairs and I 60Hz vs 120Hz vs 240Hz. For me, yes, a huge and noticeable difference. depends. Pick what you want, but it's something that needs to be taken into consideration. The difference is nowhere near “subtle” it’s a massive improvement and I couldn’t myself downgrade back to 60hz. I personally don't need this. I don't notice much difference between 60hz and 120hz unless I'm using a mouse. If your display is capped at 60Hz, it will have a flicker during movies, 60 is not divisible by 24, but 120 is. Playing the Insomniac games like Spider-Man or Ratchet and Clank RA with that modes in VRR feels like the perfekt middle ground for fluidity and visual fidelity. The average is 5-7 on 120hz, bit more just on WiFi all day. Award. They should just default 120 hertz adaptive across the board and save those resources. My choice. 4. I'm comparing the Sony X85K vs the X80K ($100 less for the X80K). Also, most games compromise resolution and graphics to run at 120hz and a lot of times it's just not worth it when playing on a TV. The 270hz would feel slightly smoother / quicker, especially for mouse movements in a first person shooter. Having said that if you are an "office" worker and the content is primary static you will probably not notice it. That's the advantage of an ips screen. And yeah, just leave it at 120hz, there’s no point keeping it 60hz since there are some games that play 120fps like call of duty vanguard. 0" 3440x1440 144 Hz, curved VA panel, 350 nit brightness, HDMI and DisplayPort. 60fps vs 30fps is a curse. The game is locked at 60 fps, so there's not really a reason to go above 60hz. In my opinion oled is better , but keep in mind the risk of permanent burn-in with static content in the long run. Samsung's 60hz sucks especially compared to iPhone. Here are a couple suggestions. LG UltraGear 34GK950F 34" 144Hz UWQHD FreeSync 2 Curved Nano IPS Gaming Monitor. The we did 120hz vs 144hz got some missed some , then 144hz vs 240hz, there is an improvement in fluidity , and any sort of ghosting or “blur” is 100% gone, movement looks sharp. Especially since with an R9 380 I should be able to max most games pretty easily and the extra frame rates would give it something to get once I get past 60fps. So it's not a good investment in a tv, yeah it has Or is this the case if the actual game is running at 120hz? From my understanding, as long as the source (the console) supports HDMI 2. ago. • 2 yr. HDMI 1. Less smooth than 120Hz, prone to "film judder" and blurriness. All European TVs are either 60Hz or 120Hz but they are equiped with a 50Hz or 100Hz toggle for the local TV broadcasts. In fact, while a little different than phones, most pro gamers opt for 1080 and higher refresh rate than a higher resolution and less frames. Ive seen high end Sony Samsung and LG with 120hz gameplay clips and theyre full of judders at fast panning motions or fast motion in the background and its painful to watch. The 120hz LED could be anything from a bad LG NANO to a Samsung QN90A which are very different TVs. . A 60hz panel can't display 24hz content smoothly, a 120hz panel can. To answer your question: 60 hz with VRR = perceptively more stable 60 fps gameplay. I only 120HZ if necessary. No. Well I had to turn off adaptive refresh rate for video streaming as it would stutter. 5hrs of SOT You think it's worth the extra hour? Archived At that point, its hard to go back. Most TVs have this feature; a 60Hz TV can interpolate 30 fps content, while a 120Hz TV can interpolate 30 and 60 fps content. But unless you’re a pro gamer it’s not going to matter. Lenovo 66A1GCCBUS 34. 60hz = you see 60 pictures per second. If gaming then definitely 120hz 1080p you won't notice 1440p as much as you would an upgrade to 120hz wouldn't help the PS5 much as their's only one game that uses it so far, Dirt 5. Input latency is tied to FPS, so any perception of reduced latency running 40 FPS @ 120 Hz is tied entirely to frame rate, not refresh rate (in this case). Any movie/video watching app should be at 60Hz and Social Media app or app that involves a lot of scrolling (browser) should be in 120 Hz category. the TV will do 120hz. 120hz = you see 120 pictures per second. I upgraded from 4K 60Hz to 4K 144Hz yesterday, I spent a while just moving around windows and watching how smooth everything was, it's wayyy more noticeable than I thought it was going to be. I know many of you will shake their heads, but i find 120hz on mobile devices completely unnecessary and i always turn on 60hz mode on my devices. The 60hz was a Vizio and had no motion interpolation features. Unfortunately, like most other TVs we've tested in 2021, it can't display 4k @ 120Hz signals properly. Your tv only has a 60hz refresh rate. Works fine at 60Hz. 1 120hz, and the TV supports HDMI 2. 2k or 2560 x 1440 = 3,686,400 pixels per frame, at 120hz or fps you are rendering around 442,386,000 pixels per second. 60hz monitor shows 60 pictures (frames) per second. A 120hz TV is CAPABLE of displaying a refresh rate up to 120hz, but you MUST have the hardware capable of outputting such a signal. The vertical resolution is cut in half, resulting in a 3840 x 1080 interlaced signal, so text isn't displayed properly. I really hope manufacturers start implementing this next year! Not necessary. STRATEGO-LV. I think you have to set a default setting to 120hz in the console settings, and then every game which allows for it will set it to that frame rate by default. 0 can run 144Hz 1440P or 60Hz 4k (might be slightly off on HDMI 2. You would need a 120HZ TV to see 120 FPS or a monitor that It doesn’t the maximum output from the switch is going to be 60 fps so 60 hz, even the Xbox one and PS4 pro output at 60 fps some games. Or to put it more simply: You would think that if they completely remove the option to switch to 60 hertz refresh you would be saving processing power in the background, resources and or storage space just to have it waiting if you decide to turn it on. Yes, it's worth upgrading to 120Hz regardless of the type of game you play. It's noticeable but not to a huge degree like 60 to 90 is. , deinterlacing effects on non-interlaced, digital TV). It doesn't matter as much for this game as a game that actually supports 120hz (like most shooters on the market) but could have some benefits. In answer to the second question no. But VRR + FPS limiter is massive difference either way. Most games cant do 4K60 either. So you loose hdr for higher frame rate. It’s also worth noting that these screens can also drop below 60hz for reading (10hz) and videos (24hz) depending on format. It is “smoother” I don’t think anyone is going to argue that. I don't even know what I'm looking at anymore 😂. but your GPU's 2nd output is going out to a TV that can do 120hz,. However, the only way to truly enjoy 120Hz is to have the source also be 120fps, eliminating the need for motion interpolation. Hi there, I apologize in advance as I'm sure this has already been asked. I keep mine only on 120Hz and no significant battery drain so go for it. 3. While 120 Hz without VRR = up to 120 fps (better input lag and smoother performance) but you may see slight issues if the FPS fluctuates. It should also be noted that TV "framerates" are often achieved using a 60hz panel with processing so they can claim "120hz" performance. HZ is how often the monitor/TV refreshes the image on screen - no impact on your consoles output. 0" 3440x1440 144 Hz, IPS panel, 250 nit brightness, HDMI and DisplayPort, built in speakers. I'm between an 85" Sony X80K (60Hz) and 75" Sony X85K (120Hz). g. yampi30. Personally I like a PPI of about 95 with the screen at arms length. They'd rather play at 200 FPS on a 60 Hz monitor than at 60 FPS on the same 60 Hz monitor. The big difference is 60hz vs. 60hz vs 120hz (Battery life check) So I've been using my phone from 60hz from the past one week and I did notice an increase in battery life. I value battery life over negligible differences like frame rate. I use 60Hz on my tv too, not a big enough difference for me to use my 120hz monitor that’s Lets say you have a Desktop computer hooked up to a Monitor that can only do 60hz Refresh,. Read about the 60Hz vs 120Hz TV debate to see if the refresh rate of a TV matters to the average viewer. 40 FPS @ 120 Hz simply repeats the same frame three times, until the next one is ready. jcwillia1. I'm looking to purchase a new 4k TV for my living room. When the show or movie you are watching only has 24 frames or 30 frames per second, then your TV just shows you doubles of the same picture or it shows you a picture that is a merging of two frames using is processor. A 60fps game played with the TV at 120Hz processes user input 60 times a second. Last week I upgraded from a 4k native 60hz TV to a 4k native 120hz TV. 1440p 60hz for sure. 67ms. Your TV is still outputting 120 FPS in this scenario, but in reality every second frame is just a repeat of Feb 25, 2021 · It allows the TV to generate frames between existing ones, increasing the frame rate to match up to the refresh rate. I was thinking of uppgrading to a newer, bigger TV and I’m considering 2 options that cost almost the same. The only way that a 120Hz TV will benefit from the 48fps playback is that there will be more frames available for the interpolation process, potentially making the results more convincing. Get the one with better image quality. I'm a sports fan. The jump from 60fps to 120fps is as dramatic as the jump from 30fps to 60fps. the second TV is 55ich and 120hz. 120 hz is definetly nice to look at, especially if you're just surfing around (just keep in mind things like youtube only support 60 hz). It’s arguable how much is even perceived. In my own research I have not found an answer that I'm able to understand… You can use a 120hz DLP (which has microsecond response time), and check that you can still easily see the interval between frames. seeing conflicting info. Samsung 32" 1080p 60Hz $~215 Vizio 32" 1080p 120Hz $~250 The 120hz tv is about 30-35$ more than the 60hz tv, however since I plan to use the tv for gaming the extra cost may be worth it. It's unlikely that he had it, but HDMI can support at least 120hz. Unless you own a 3090, forget it. 144hz is good too obviously but not at the expense of higher pixel density. 30 FPS @ 60 Hz repeats the same frame twice. Price. for example when scrolling it will use 80hz. VRR and 120 fps at 4k on some games. It’s trade off, some tv’s will give lower latency to higher hz. And 120 in dynamic motion rate. The OLED with a pixel response time near 1ms, the image is less blurry, resulting in a clearer image when moving. All that said, OLED is amazing in games with dark scenes, far better than IPS in my opinion. I recently went from the Note 9 (60 Hz) to S20 FE 5G (120 Hz). Need to consider resolution and screen size at the same time - both of them together will tell you the PPI (pixels per inch) If the PPI is too high you may not be able to read numbers and labels in software/plugins that don't have scaling. I want to upgrade my setup and I’m thinking of getting the new “affordable” LG A1 OLED, but it supports only 60hz. The fact that your Monitor can only do 60hz is separate from the TV. As for movement, some applications scroll smoother with 120 Hz (or ProMotion). I get that it looks way better, but i am just not a 120hz kind of guy. Little side info, i actually like both systems very If your PC can produce 120fps+ in games it will feel smooth and slightly more responsive. The consoles are using dynamic resolution to hit 4K/60 FPS in a lot of games so the resolution can drop down as low as 1080p at times. 60hz screens don't really handle 24p the same way since they have to do 3 flashes of one frame then 2 of the next, then 3 and so on. I have been using a 60Hz display all my life. This does not change the native refresh rate of the monitor and the panel will still output 60 frames per second despite appearing to output 120 frames per second. i don't use 60hz on a regular basis. Some like MKBHD claim that, once you use 120, you can’t go back to 60. All top end tvs have 120Hz panels but they also have better processors that can handle motion and picture quality better. That said, if you have a 60HZ TV, even if your console is rendering 120 FPS, you're still only seeing 60fps because that's your TVs hard limit. Once you try 60, 30 becomes unplayable. 5. 60hz vs 120hz serious question I use a 4k 120hz TV and you The higher refresh rate will have a much more noticeable impact day to day, and is also better or battery life than the higher resolution. my current TV is 32 inches and old (7 years maybe) so any of the two will be a huge upgrade but i wanted some advice as im not so techy. It is worth the extra money. For video playback, 120hz has a benefit over 144hz. 1 120HZ, players should be able to get the lower input lag even if the game runs at 30hz or 60hz. If you provide specific model numbers, that would be more helpful. 120/24=5 which is an equal number and that makes motion handling better for movies and series. I wish we had them in western countries, this is a phone made by sharp for Japan. 60 OLED. " It makes the TV show or movie look unnaturally All my TV's have always been the standard refresh rate 60hz which is cool with me. I leave adaptive on for everything else. So I have been trying to research this but have yet to find a definitive answer. Discussion. burninrock24. 0 but it's basically just as good as DP currently but HDMI 2. The home of EA SPORTS F1 on Reddit! Unofficial, fan-run community for all Codemasters F1 games. 120hz makes for a smoother picture with less ghosting. 120hz is a gimmick. If you like a curved monitor and better brightness get the Lenovo. It's just automatically turned on battery saving when the battery charge hits 20% by activating routines. 85” Samsung Class QE1C QLED 4K (60Hz) >> my understanding this about equivalent to the Samsung Q60 model. The main difference as far as I'm concerned is that the X85K has a 120Hz panel whereas the X80K has a 60Hz panel. Check the brightness, Color accuracy and response time. Bump up to the q70t or go with a vizio. If PPI is too low things look blocky. Yeah 60 to 144 is a MASSIVE leap. to answer your question, turning off 120hz doesn’t save much battery because the display refresh rate changes based on what you do. If you use a 120hz monitor, it looks better if you are able to throw out those 120fps. 60 with VRR. Native 120hz and Blu-rays. 86" LG UR8000 (120Hz) RTINGS have both of these models at the same score, with maybe the Samsung QE1C (using the Q60 review) being marginally better for my needs. it is not always 120hz. reading a book/news article without scrolling is 10hz. You will definitely notice it if you put 2 monitors side by side, but when you are using the 60Hz it would be fine. Quality may decrease if wrong settings are used (e. 60hz has to do what's called 3:2 pull down, 3 of 1 frame, 2 of the next, which can lead to judder. There are pros and cons to both from what I understand - 2017 model gained WCG, but lost dimming zones and only 120hz screens have been discussed in various forums to increase the overall smoothness of the screen and scrolling. Works well with TV and film. I'd assume you mean the LG A1 for the OLED as it's one of the few 60hz OLEDs for sale. Does running your TV and Series X at 4K 120HZ have an effect on the…. Both options are 4k and exactly the same apart from: One TV is 49 inch with 60hz. Vizio is replacing the unit for the 2nd time in less than a year for various technical issues. I have two options mind. On X3 NFC, 120Hz has the better battery life between the 2 modes. •. Unless you carry two phones, one 60, the other 120, it’s not bad at all. 40fps VRR is a great feature. If you actually want true high refresh rate gaming, a PC and a high refresh rate monitor is the way to go. 8k TV's are extremely expensive. A PC is not only for gaming. No quality on video playback although 60hz is better because it saves battery especially if streaming over Wi-Fi. Yes, you can feel the 120hz mostly by gaming. 0. And all the VRR and crap mentioned has NOTHING to do with the TV, but rather the hardware/software that actually produces the signal that is sent to the TV. The 2 options are a 65” 60hz TV (larger) and a 55” 120hz TV (higher frame rate). only 60Hz, no freesync, high resolution and TB port. So it's really just the refresh rate difference. Im just about a TV in the black friday sale. Pixel response time may be theoretically lower on an OLED but it's not always the case and you'd still notice 120hz over 60. Others would never go back to 60 Hz once they used ProMotion. The 120hz is a Samsung with Auto Motion Plus but that is all turned off. The same can be said for the x85k as it's a va screen as well. iOS, in comparison to Android, has smoother animations. 120Hz panels handles motion better than 60Hz panels. If you’ve always used a 60hz phone, you shouldn’t care if the rest of the phone is great. This TV will see no game console usage or Bluray. It's the same as the difference between 80fps and 120fps. Option if high refresh rate is better. Monitors: LG 34WK95U-W 34" 5K UltraWide HDR 600 Nano IPS LED Monitor with Thunderbolt 3. 1 that offers 4K at 120FPS also does ALLM and VRR which absolutely improve the experience, for that reason alone I would get a HDMI 2. Having to output more than twice the Smoother than 60Hz. I went from 50hz to 240hz, was like seeing colour for the first time. The other reason is that most movies and series run in 24Hz and 60Hz panels can't properly display that refresh rate without making motion interpolation, since 60/24=2,5 not an equal number. It will drain your battery considerably faster than the 60hz mode, but that shouldn't be a problem considering you don't game And even if you did game, then only few games support over 60 hz, though those It would suck to lose the pretty picture just to sometimes get 120 FPS. The 4K@60Hz you are referring to could be TCL S546 or AU8000. Here it looks like things are pretty even but there is more at play. So get the 240 hz motion rate but actually 120hz panel for that smooth 5:5 pulldown and then turn off all of the interpolated motion nonsense. Not that many next gen games support 120hz and in the future as games get more complex there will probably be even less 120hz games on this console generation. So Apple's 60 Hz "feels" smoother than Samsung's. I've got a 2080S and I get about 160 in warzone, mixed settings. If your primary use is CS:GO, you should buy a 120hz TN monitor. Examples of this are: Samsung 65" QN800A 8k tv msrp $3,500 and on sale for $2,800 where you can get a 65" OLED msrp $2,500 now on sale for $1,800 and even a 77" OLED msrp $3,800 on sale for $3,000. 120Hz is a battery killer. My hope is that instead of 30fps, 40fps via 120hz container (and VRR so it can fluctuate a bit without being annoying) will become the new standard for this gen. Probably a huge difference if you never experienced 120hz. High refresh rate and freesync, but lack of TB port. CMVTHATSME1. VRR is more important than 120hz. I also have 2x 27" 1440p 165 Hz monitors on my desktop. watching a movie, it will refresh at 24hz. 24p from blurays, 30p or 60p. Went from a base 12 to a 15 pro and the 120hz is definitely an upgrade compared to 60hz. 120fps might help in something competitive like CoD, but for something more "laid back" 1440p would my choice. 4 can run 120Hz at 1080p HDMI 2. Share. if you are playing offline games, simulators and casual type stuff, you're probably better with a nicer quality 60hz screen. elsewhwre on that as well. Sample video of U8H at 4k 60hz 60hz vs 120hz Battery drain and Smoothness. Acer XV340CK Pbmiipphzx 34. Hotel_kilo_13. The 4K@120Hz could be Q70A or TCL R646. I am currently on android and i am thinking about getting an iphone 15 pro. Well worth it. I have a Vizio M65-D0 2016 model that has 120hz native refresh rate. 30>40fps is actually a bigger increase in frame time than you would expect since 30fps is 1s/30 = 33ms and 1s/60 = 16. No display technology can make up for a difference in refresh rate. I found about a 30-45 minute reduction in SOT going from 1080p/60hz to 1440p/120hz. 1. I think the gif speaks for itself. This added advantage can signif It would depend on what you want to play. In Youtube, most content is 30 or 60 fps, meaning a 120 Hz display does not matter for that content. . Technically the faster the frame rate, the less I was looking at this Samsung for example: UN55MU6300 spec sheet says 60hz native 120 effective. OLED - You can see better. My TV burnt out, so I've been eyeing replacements and have narrowed it down to this Samsung or this Sony. 120hz panels just flash it 5 times per frame, every frame so it's much better for Destiny 2 is capped at 60 FPS on consoles (except for crucible), but the Xbox runs everything in a 120hz container on a 120hz TV. But Tia definitely not a night and day improvement, 144hz and 120hz is a very smooth experience , specially for single player titles , but works perfectly well for A 120hz IPS panel doesn't mean the monitor is free from input lag - in fact the Korean IPS monitors tend to have significantly higher input lag than 120hz TN gaming-orientated monitors. Most series and films are shot at 24fps and then most of the live TV and broadcast is shot at 60 fps. 120hz panels are desirable since it handles fast motion much better at any standard frame rate. But consider that HDMI 2. They are offering the 2017 model M65-E0 or the model I have currently. I normally use it from 80% to 20% and on an avg I get about 3. 4K60 is already a huge improvement over the 4K30, 1440p30, 1080p30 that the current consoles output. I think this also applies in Australia, but there's basically no TVs that are restricted to 50Hz, as the TV will simply switch up to 60Hz when needed. Both are 4k TV from this year. • 3 yr. FPS is how many frames the console outputs. I've to stay out a lot, every single battery parentage is essential for me and I'm using s23 base version if you are gonna use 60hz only just get the base 15. What I'm wondering is whether or not I need to upgrade my TV at the same time. iPhone 15 base should have been at least 90hz in my opinion because it looks clean on the pixel phones. I don't know if it's worth the money, because sooner or later it won't even make a difference anymore and just becomes "60hz" again and you'll find yourself thinking about upgrading to a 240hz monitor for the same reason you moved from a 60hz to a 120hz one. tv. The TV I have is 4k in theory, but is an older model LG (55UM7300PUA) that has a 60 Hz native refresh rate with 120 Hz upscaling. Movies are typically in 24fps or 30fps - both of these evenly divide into 120, but not into 144. Text on 1440p is so much sharper and just using Windows is so much more enjoyable. There is no 8k content from movies, tv shows and gaming. I'm looking to buy a TV for my living room that I won't be gaming on. It is on PC. I notice when watching blu-ray movies on the 120hz that the content is extremely smooth which I Aug 29, 2022 · Artificially pumping the content's frame rate to 60 or above (usually 120Hz for higher-end TVs) can produce what's known as the "soap opera effect. All good tvs have 120Hz panels but not all 120Hz tvs are good. The number of 120 fps games will be very, very limited. iamatoad_ama. As I noted in a previous reply, for watching movies, a 120HZ display is the minimum I would recommend because most movies are shot in 24 fps. Go with Hisense U8H. Only issue you may find if you buy OLED regardless what kids on internet will tell you there is a small chance of screen burn in effect if you use it for long hours every day on high brightness. Ori and the will of the wisps) and most games that do 120 Hz will have a resolution under 4k. My old flagship Sony TV was 120hz and it didn't even accept a 120hz signal, even at 1080p. You just won’t get frame rates above 60 at 4K resolution. A 4K 60hz TV will be fine for 90% of the people. The reason for 120Hz TVs, currently, is to correctly play 24 fps video content without judder. I need to buy a new phone. Reply. For example, monitors with a native refresh rate of 60 Hz will have a motion rate of 120Hz. It's usually not a true 120hz panel. 40fps is actually in the middle of YouTube has so many informative videos, many showing examples and explaining the the differences. It also divides evenly for 24fps content each frame refreshes 5 times. 120hz. Two TVs using 60Hz or 120HZ might have a big difference for motion processing, one can stutter very badly at 24fps and the other one runs perfectly. Honestly a marginal difference in most games, however with a 120hz tv some games (ratchet and clank / spiderman off the top of my head) run at 40fps fidelity which Imo is a great compromise over either 30fps fidelity / 60fps performance. Update 11/24/2021: We rechecked 4k @ 120Hz support on this TV. Game and reader - 60Hz. Then elsewhere I see "Motion rate 120" for the same. Keep in mind that just because a TV is good for sports doesn't mean it is good for movies as most Samsung and LG TVs have poor HDR movie scores but do well in TV/sports scores due to brightness/reflection handling being the primary metric for quality instead of picture quality that's expressed in the movies/HDR movies scores. Ask ANY professional FPS player. But it's not just that. But again, for some, 120 Hz is a big plus in applications which support it. Reply reply. Allowing the PS5 to run games at 120 FPS makes it a little more appealing to -let's say- competitive shooters, specially if said game supports mouse and keyboard. I wouldn’t get less than 240hz because now 144hz will be normal, 240hz will be the best gaming experience and 360hz is if you want to most possible don’t test anything less than 240hz. What might be important and it is not stated is how good the TV motion processing is. I heard that pixels shift almost instantly on an OLED, so would gaming on a 60hz OLED be comparable to gaming on a faster ADMIN MOD. In most cases watching in 1080p with the display at 50% works nicely. The difference between 60Hz and 120Hz isn’t going to improve your reflexes. Most movies run in 24Hz and 120Hz is evenly dividable by 24, 60 isn't. Now the phone I was looking for has a 90Hz. Competitive or not the motion looks so much more fluid. I was also looking at the TCL 55S405 with an advertised 120hz rate but I'm. Yes. Refresh rate is what it is. Filmed on a pixel xl at 240fps. This is why a 120Hz TV is an advantage over 60Hz since it can interpolate more types of content. 5-4hrs of SOT with 120hz and I switched to 60hz and I'm getting 4hrs-4. I don't care about either 3D or Smart features because I have a PS3 and would likely not watch 3D content. It definitely depends on what you're comparing to. TV footage more likely to appear smooth than film due to frame rate differences. It seems like all 120hz TVs advertise a judder free experience from any source. If you can get a monitor that's both 1440p and 120hz you'll get the best of both worlds, and switch between performance modes depending on the game. Reviews on Reddit. 4k 60hz with VRR is the way to go and Hisense does it best. In my opinion, the extra money to get 120Hz on a 4k TV is not worth it in most cases, because I personally would always choose 4k60 over 120Hz with lower resolution in non-competitive games. It's just that LCDs are too slow. This year I bought a 120hz Samsung TV but still have my older 60 hz one. The difference between 120hz and 240hz is exactly twice as small as the difference between 60hz and 120hz. 1 TV. To take advantage of 120 hz you are going to need a pc. 120hz monitor shows 120 pictures (frames) per second. Native 4K/120hz is very much a noticeable difference. as long as your GPU can push 120hz,. The 55” is a samsung and the 65” is LG. LeeH44. It will still work, but, if you don't get 100fps or more, then it won't look as good as 60 fps on a 60hz monitor. Someone please do this experiment using sim card and without sim cards. using always on display, it will refresh And it is quite noticeable when the content of the screen (phone or monitor) is moving. The IPS is most likely around 4 to 5 ms, which makes it blurry. Because it has a nonzero effect on input latency, the Xbox will double the frame rate of any <=60 FPS game. Eg for any games locked to 60fps it'll look cleaner at 120 than 90. 4k Blu-ray Players - 60 Hz or 120 Hz Televison? So I'm looking to finally bite the bullet and switch up to a 4k blu-ray player. 0 is pretty recent). I can't believe how much more smoothly and how improved the touch latency is on the 120 hz display and how it compares to 60hz. pv aa bn ac rm jd mh rb ga fa