1440p vs 4k ps5 reddit.

1440p vs 4k ps5 reddit I want to know why in my pc experience a game running on a 4k monitor at 1440p resolution looks horrible and that game would look so much better on a 1440p monitor, and I just wanted to know if it's the same on ps5 thanks for reading I'm new to next gen consoles 1440p with basic spatial upscaling to 4K practically locked 60fps (barring minor drops in some heavy cutscenes) Balanced mode: dynamic 1080p-1440p temporal reconstruction up to 4K for cleaner image fidelity than Performance Mode (and sometimes even cleaner than the Quality Mode) Pixel density and viewing distance are your key factors. But what if I get a oled 2k monitor vs a 4K ips monitor. 4K, also known as 2160p or Ultra HD, has a screen resolution of 3860 x 2160 pixels or 4096 x 2160 pixels and produces higher-quality images. 4K has more than twice the total pixel count. Even in titles that don't render natively at 4k, the PS5 dashboard and game UI interfaces all will render in crisp 4k, with the game geometry rendering somewhere between 1080p and 4k. Setting resolution to 4k looks sharper in my opinion. But with a 4090, you could definitely game on 4K. It will also output 1440p bandwidth. Alot of the new games and Sony exclusives have vrr and can play up to 120hz, it's 4k 120hz, but games destiny 2 are actually 1440p 120hz crucibles but checkerboard (upscaled at 4k) so ye it can do it, but majority of games are 4k 60hz. I used a PS5 for around a year with a 1080p screen before upgrading to a 4K screen a few months ago. For me it's making more sense to go 1440 because the difference vs 4k is supposedly negligible at a 2-3 foot distance, 1440p 144hz pc gaming is more accessible and cheaper that 4k 144hz both in monitor and gpu, and even if you wanted to go 4k 144hz for your ps5, you'd have to wait and spend even more money on brand spanking new hdmi 2. Thank you! The automatic resolution feature is a huge thing the PS5 has in favor of the Series X/S at least if you use a HDMI 2. A separate but related question is how good would 4K downscaled to 1440p look on a 1440p monitor, or 1440p upscaled with fsr to 4K on a 1440p monitor. 4k quality has lower draw distance, all the others are the ultra settings, they look identical. Very few games on PS5 are going to hit 4k 60fps, but that would be my preference of the two choices. PS4 Pro runs 1440p 30fps, PS5 runs 4K 30fps, not sure how they're the same, yeah games can also run at 1440p but it's literally 60fps which was never seen on any console generation before, (only a handful of ps4 pro games might run 1080-60fps on some performance mode but most devs didn't want to sacrifice the graphical fidelity) 24 votes, 94 comments. I have no idea why they decided to compare a 24" 1080p to a 27" 1440p while keeping the comparison between 1440p and 4K the same size, though. Mar 31, 2023 · Others want no less than 1440p and don't care if it's even 30hz. My opinion is if this will be exclusively for the PS5, get a 4k 120Hz display with HDMI 2. With monitor-sampling being the process where a non-1440p monitor either up or downsamples the PS5's output; and with PS5-sampling being the console offering a 1440p output, but either up or downsampling the graphics internally, depending on the game's graphics modes (performance vs quality). Pros: Hey. Along with a second PS5 so I can have one in the living room for comfy 4K single player gaming and one in my game room for competitive gaming 😁. You could play a game like cyberpunk on PC 1440p ultra settings and be way more impressed w/ it's image then the "4k" image on ps5 because of the sacrifices that have to be made on console. I do use 4k monitor “Lg 27up650”, it is clean 60hz plus supports HDR. It's really not "bad", and I seriously doubt you'll have the time to notice, frame by frame, whatever marginal differences one sees on 4K vs 1440p (assuming you have all the necessary hardware, costing as much as an OLED TV, and the cables to transmit reliably to render 4K resolution 4K > 1440p Being 4K or an OLED do not, by themselves, guarantee good picture quality or a good gaming experience. 1440p looks fine, but 4K with some scaling even the desktop will wow you when it comes to stuff like text and icon clarity. Anything below 32" at a standard viewing distance you probably won't notice much difference between 1440p and 4K. If you can afford it, go 4k 120. 1 devices, buy a nice 4k/60hz TV with a gaming mode now, and then upgrade in a couple years when prices are reasonable. On the flip side, 144Hz is definitely an experience all on its own. stretching the image on a 4K display. 1080p is noticeably less sharp, whereas the difference between 60 and 120 fps, while noticeable, isn't as dramatic to my eyes. Basically every 1440p monitor skips out on HDMI 2. I once played with 4k 60 fps on ps5 and I thought it looked Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Need help on which screen to use (3060 1080p vs 4k) comments. There will be some things you want at 4k, and some things you want 120hz Absolutely. 1440p without upscaling will just look worse than 1440p on a native 1440p panel. 1440p 120hz is the best of both worlds in my opinion. Pros: Sharper image quality with more detail More immersive gaming experience Future-proof for next-gen games Cons: More expensive Requires a powerful GPU to run games at high frame rates May not be able to take full advantage of the PS5's 120Hz refresh rate 1440p Monitors. The best cheap monitor for PS5 is Dell G2724D. So your comment is way off. 0 4k displays that can do 120Hz at up to 1440p like my 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. It's hooked up to a 4K 60Hz TV (my CX runs off a 3080) and it does quite a good job at it. MGSV is one of my favourite games of all time and was wondering if since the game is running the ps4pro version which runs natively at 1440p, would it look better using a 1440p screen as well? Or will it look better if it's being upscaled to display at 4k on my current screen. I have a 1440p monitor that allows selecting a 4k input for compatibility reasons. Okay so I am in a situation where I need to pick a monitor that is either 4K 60hz or 1440p at 120hz. A handful of games support that at the moment but that list should grow in time. You don't need HDMI 2. You'll need that monitor to have an HDMI 2. There's 2 ways that you could be playing at 1440p vs 4k, and I'm not 100% certain which you mean. I think for the most part, the PS5 is downscaling any resolution that's lower than 4k to 1080p. It will refuse to change to the higher resolutions on the console end because it detects the display is incapable of producing the image Since the PS5 does not support 1440p natively an upgrade to a 1440p 144hz monitor ( which I think is the sweet spot ) is out of the question. Grrat performance and It's a good price to, goes on sale for 300. My brother plays on a 1440p 120hz monitor on PS5 and it doesn't actually output 1440p, only 1080p. 4K Monitors. downvoted for saying the truth. man, I have been playing CS2/NFS Heat/COD MW 2019, I think at best on 1440p (Ryzen 7 5700X + Nvidia 4070). Just to clarify, the PS5 games will look bad too if the monitor can't accept a 4K signal, forcing the PS5 to output only in 1080p and upscaling it to 1440p. ” PS5 that runs a lot of games at 1800p and 4k Top kek. I sit further back enough to where I have about the same fov that I do with 27inch. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. Consoles didn’t used to have this dilemma, and was part of the appeal of playing the best version of a game on the given hardware, without the additional It's 50% faster than a PS5. A Mini LED IPS panel with a quantum dot layer and those features hangs with an OLED in terms of picture quality. You are likely comparing lower quality 1440p monitors to higher quality 4k ones. 0 (which is all except the three brand new 2. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. The dell g2724d 27" 1440p 165hz, this specific 1440p monitor supports VRR on ps5 where as most hdmi 2. 4k and 120hz are both turned on and the monitor supports HDMI 2. The 1440-1800p is the internal render resolution which is then upscaled to 4k and sent to your screen. 22 votes, 67 comments. 0 can upscale decently at 4K from 1440p… Although I find that DLSS Quality 4K (which is upscaled from 1440p) looks definitely better than native 1440p… But you are using an AMD card and not Nvidia so don’t really worry about DLSS, FSR 2. High fps is so much better than 4k. Visually they look great at 5-6 feet away and don't have lag issues. However, does it support 1440p on 4K tv? Example: Metal Gear Solid V runs 1440p on ps4 pro so if I played it on my ps5, would the game display 1080p or 1440p on my 4K tv? Thank you. The PS5 currently doesn't even support 1440p output and will instead output a 1080p signal if you connect it to a 1440p monitor. Less jagged edges and also don't usually need anti aliasing at 4K. When you set the ps5 to 4k, the ps5 will push out 4k image/bandwidth. I’m looking to get a new screen for my gaming room on my ps5. You can notice it immediately, and it almost makes 1080p feel as outdated and low quality as 720p. I didn’t realise other monitors were even capable of this. With that being said, at a glance, as you increase in resolution, there should be diminishing returns, but 4K is pretty great and 8K will probably be the ideal resolution for VR, but that's just a guess, again based on pixel density and viewing distance, though this PS5 and Xbox X support 120hz so you want a 4k monitor with HDMI 2. I mostly play single player open world games so 60hz is plenty enough (most of the games dont support 120hz anyway) and gamepplay is enhanced by HDR colour output, so under 400€ you can enjoy both games and movies. Either way it’s great for being interchangeable between the two and gives you a lot of convenience. However, many of us who game with monitors already made use of fancy downsampling technology that would take a 4k image and convert said image into 1440p, allowing us to play games on the PS5 without having to render at 1080p or lower. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B Capture at 1080p and Render to 4k to increase. If the games runs at native 4K on the PS5, then go for it. PS5 and Xbox X support 1080p and 1440p but it's not ideal. This comes down to your visual angle of resolution which determines how small of an object you can see at a given distance (the average human has a visual angle of resolution of You’re not wrong, high resolution is absolutely load heavy, personally why I keep my pc at 1440p over 4k despite it being able to, prefer to have a happy medium of higher than 60, while being super clear. Because you are running either 4k downscaled to 1440p, with 4K frames per second, which is terrible in many games. . 4K The latter is a 1440p 240hz 27 inch monitor, and the m28u is 4k 144hz 28 inch. When comparing similar aspect ratios, 4K has 2. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your… So, in short, as long as your PS5 is set to 4K and your monitor can downscale from 4K then it will never upscale from 1080p, which was the main problem with 1440p monitors and the PS5, ofc direct 1440p from the PS5 would be better. Thoughts? I have been testing 4k recently as wanted to move away from 3440x1440. I'm thinking If I should by a 1440p OLED gaming monitor or a 4k gaming monitor. Recently just purchased a PS5 and have a 4k screen already. That helped me a lot. Aug 31, 2020 · Simpy put, if you want to sit on the sofa and be far from the screen, it's better to have a larger 4K display. Which I think many 1440p monitors do now. Edit 1: Thank you for answers. If you set ps5 to 1440p, the ps5 will do the shrinking. Oct 29, 2023 · Which is better for PS5 4K or 1440p? As many games struggle to maintain high frame rates with a 4k resolution, a lower 1440p resolution makes reaching higher refresh rates easier for a more fluid gaming experience. PS5 and Xbox Series X » Gigabyte M32U - This is the current king of performance and value. 1 so it can support 4k at 120hz. If you want to watch series and movies at the highest quality on your computer, then 4k is best. With a 6950XT you are looking at 60-70 FPS at max settings in 4K and 120 FPS in 1440p. Any help or advice would be great! I heard it does not support 1440p monitors but not sure anymore. Would yo go for… If image interpolation is used for upscaling then 1440p to 4K will look better than 1080p to 4K because there is significantly more input information. For example, even if the display resolution is 4k, the developer can change the internal render resolution to 1080p. Don't have a strong PC so I have to make compromises here and there. So yes 1440p will be downscaled to 1080p on PS5 because it doesn't support 1440p yet. Is 120hz better than 4k and will a 1440p or 4k/60 monitor be good for the next couple of years? I play mostly single player games like god of war, horizon zero dawn and Spider-man but i also enjoy f1, call of duty and fifa. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 2- 1440p ultra settings using DLSS on PC (4070 Super) As shown by Digital Foundry, Enhanced PS5 Pro games using PSSR look better than past native 4k graphical modes, as shown in games like FFVII Rebirth and TLoU Part 2. It had me looking at TN but ultimately that feels backwards for the price, and 240hz feels a bit out of budget at the moment as well as there being 360hz QD-OLED panels in the If you try to set your display to 1440p/4K on a 1080p display, either: A. But I searched a bunch of forums/reddit/DF for Performance vs Quality modes/comparisons for both Demon’s Souls and Spider-Man MM. Hi all, I’m currently debating on purchasing either a 1440p OLED, or 4K OLED. Measure your distance to your screen. 4K TV’s now offer 120hz+ and response times <5ms. 0 or some other upscaler to achieve a "4k" image. The size doesn’t matter to me as I can sit as close or far as I want. As someone who had a 4k 60 1440p 120, and replaced it with 4k 120 (samsung qled to lg oled, in case your curious) I'll throw in my two cents. it still runs pretty poorly and inconsistently even at the The difference between 4k and 1440p is noticeable when looking at them side by side from a distance, especially if your 4k display is larger than your 1440p monitor. Contrast is ok. This should be standard I think for PS5. It doesn't display as many colors, particularly in HDR, so the picture quality is slightly worse, and it doesn't have a USB hub either, so you can't connect any devices directly to the monitor. If you want HDR, check the HDR peak brightness in the specs (Brightness in nits or cd/m2. That's why I game on my PS5 with a 4k TV and will be gaming on my PC in 1440p because I'd be playing my PS5 from a distance as where my PC I'm playing at an arms length away which Regarding going 1440p or 4k… for that size of display don’t bother with 4k. the difference in resolution between 4K and 1440p is not as visible as what people often say. Could pick up the 27 today or would need to save up and hope for some good Black Friday deals on pc The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. I don't think any game can run 120fps, possibly a Ps5 pro will have that power and i've seen some videos showing that the 4k may have ghosting effect, if you choose a higher hz say 120hz you may notice interpolation, stuttering juddering and screen tearing even on movies so personally i'd stick with a 4K 60fps TV with a good hdmi 2. I render at high bit depth, but YT still compresses too much so on darker videos I render to 4k. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. I have a 3080 and ps5 and I wanted to get a 4K native and downscale it to 2k for gaming on my pc but when I use it on my ps5 I’d just leave it at 4k. The PS5 is still a great experience even without the best of the best monitors/TVs. BF2042 4k slightly lowered settings 110fps, my 1440p ultra-wide hits 165fps 95% of the time. » LG ‎27GR95QE-B - OLED, 240hz, . Most of the games shown were native 4K. Either more detail in everything when using the same game fov, or more detail because you can extend the game fov at same density. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Personally, I have 32" 4K 144hz on my work rig and 27" 1440p 180hz (both IPS) for gaming, but I'm getting 300fps so I'm flirting with the idea of a 240hz monitor or more. Right on a 1440p monitor you will want to be using 1440p120Hz mode (if applicable) however, and this is where it gets tricky, if you have a 1440 monitor that can accept a 4K signal, the only way to do so is by allowing 4K and choosing the 4K option in video settings (on the Xbox) which will then be locked to 60Hz if the monitor is HDMI 2. upscaling is superior to running the whole thing at a lower res. 1440p vs. There is no doubt in my mind that most will offer quality and performance modes. It depends If the PS5 does use the 1440p resolution or not. Some people will say what's the point of going back down to 1080p with a 4k monitor, but with a 1440p monitor, you don't get this flexibility without the image getting blurred to some extent. r/RainbowSixSiege. Is there a noticeable difference between 4K and Up until now I’ve been using a 60hz 4k Monitor, but with both the PC and PS5 being able to hit 144hz (120hz for the ps5) im stuck on if I should sacrifice the 4k for 1440p but get that 120-144fps. Upscaling can work well if the pixels are upscaling by an integer (2x from 1080p to 2160p) as opposed to a fraction/decimal (1. If your computer can capture at 1440p and still get good fps while gaming then do it. 5x in the case of 1080p to 1440p). With current prices for HDMI 2. But then you go back to 1440p and realise how much blurrier it is. Plus ps5 won't ever be pushing out newer games that can do 4k 144hz, hell probably won't be many 4k 60hz moving forward if they get better and better looking. 4K@60fps is the minimum on PC, I can deal with 4K@30fps on PS5. Triple monitors 1080p vs 1440p on a 3080 4K 60FPS with Ray Tracing on PS5/Series X i switched from 4k to 1440p not long ago to get a higher refresh rate, and I can very much tell the difference. Also, running in 1440p mode does not change the games rendering resolution, only the output resolution. I want to get Rebirth but just curious how the graphics are post-patch on a 1440p monitor. There are just a few 120fps cross-gen titles and once games are current-gen-only you won't see new 120fps releases anymore Most 120fps modes actually run 80-120fps at 1080p with noticable worse visuals. Since 1440p support on console is a scaler function only, games will still render at the developer target, using FSR 2. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 G95SC to get 49 in 240hz, 2nd gen OLED or Alienware AW3423DWF for 34" OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations Would you rather go slightly smaller and run a PS5/XSX/PC on 1440p or wait and get the larger 32in 4k but also have to build a completely new PC (current set up is an i7-9700k/2070S) Money isn’t an issue but it’s also not freely available. you can run 1440p on a 4k using upscaling, same performance as 1440p but looks a lot better and the UI is full res. 1 connection, HDR support, variable refresh rate (VRR) and low input lag. 1 monitors Edit: looks like 4k 60hz is the most popular followed by 1440p 120hz then lastly 1080p 120hz. And another thing is that the jump from 1440p to 4k is not as big. The 7900xtx gives me anxiety at 4k when you get used to the crazy frame rates on 1440p. PS5 is huge performance jump over PS4. You just forgot to mention that at 30fps, mix of low to medium settings and just high textures and dropping that resolution down to even 720p in more demanding scenes. But on my ps5 i also can select 2160p, what option is better for a monitor like this 1440p or 2160p? Another thing, if you plan to use the monitor for console gaming, you can also game at 4k, since PS5 outputs a 1080p when connected to a 1440p monitor. Yes I can. 1440p still looks great and there’s more and more games coming out with 120 fps capability/unlocked framerates so 4k isn’t worth being stuck on playing at 60 fps. I can tell the difference in quality after the change, but I still really enjoyed using a PS5 with a 1080p screen. Recently I've been playing a lot of console games on my ps5 so I've been using my 4k. 4k video still looks good on a 1440p screen as the bitrate is generally more important than the resolution, but watching 1080p to 1440p is a pretty big jump. t's a step-down model from the Dell Alienware AW2724DM, so there are a few differences. However now the big decision to make is : 4k 60hz monitor or 1080p 144hz , keen to get a 27 inch monitor but a bit worried that 1080p on a 27 inch monitor will look a bit coarse. There’s a performance penalty for running a larger monitor if you hate jaggies. However, I cannot set the PS5 to output at 1440p meaning presumably my monitor cannot accept 1440p signal. There's a handful of games that only do 1440p 60fps and throttle to 30fps at 4K on PS5. My current monitor/tv set up is a 1440p Asus… so i decided to swap my PS5 over to the main monitor i use for my PC, which is 1440p, but also supports high refresh rate and HDR, vs my tv, which is 4k. 1440p Monitors for PS5 Gaming. You will prob end up using FSR a lot. Limiting PS5 to 1440p on 2160/4k screens gives higher quality visuals. So I've bought a 1440p monitor for my PS5, and while it's on the way I've started to wonder what the picture quality will be like compared to a native 1440p image from a PC. As a csgo gamer, too, 144Hz is the top consideration. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. But I do use my 3080 more then my ps5 so I guess getting a 2k monitor would be good. This should give the best results possible. Outputting a native resolution is likely to be better because a GPU can rescale more accurately and faster than a monitor. The only difference that happens sometimes when playing ps5 games is it asks me if i prefer a higher frame rate (better performance)or ray tracing (better graphics). If you want to play some last gen games and older games too, most PS4 and Xbox One games are 1080p (with some exceptions, Metal Gear Solid 5 is 1080p-1440p on PS5, while it was 720p-900p on Xbox because Xbox One was really underpowered) and it might look a little fuzzy on 4K TVs, and I play a lot of 360 and OG Xbox games via GamePass so 1080p We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'm looking to upgrade my PS5/PC monitor and I'm trying to decide between 1440p vs 4k. Moreover, some games in performance mode are even 1080p 60fps… so the graphics looks shit on 4k screen. Hoping to find the best picture-to-performance setting. Which in some cases make the game blurry. im using LG 65 B9 OLED and playing on xbox one x 4k 60hz, i dont notice much difference from 1440p 120Hz. In terms of the PS5 option to output 2560x1440 vs 3840x2160 there is no benefit to lowering it unless your display just does not support "4k. Would I see a difference? With the review out being that pc and ps5 performance is all similar which of the two options would you choose? 4K 85” TV on PS5 1440p Ultrawide monitor on a 3070ti PC 5M subscribers in the PS5 community. With modern tech, it's unfortunately obvious that even strong specs struggle to do 4k 60fps. 240Hz looks really clean compared to 144Hz, whereas I’m shocked people can even play at 30-60Hz. 4K 120 vs 4K 60 HDR ps5 1728 res on 1080p vs 1440p upvote The PS5 is not designed and/or powerful enough to output 144fps at native 4k in AAA titles and buying a 1080p screen is definitely not future proof. So 4k 60Hz should work great. 1440p is still what I'd recommend for most, but the difference is certainly there. If playing on a 1080p or 1440p screen, or if for some other reason you have your PS5 set to output in 1080p or 1440p, then use “Performance Sharp”. I mainly play competitive titles and watch tv/youtube on pc and single player games on ps5, but am planning to play triple a games on pc once it’s built, and sticking to ps5 exclusives. Because most of its games are running closer to that resolution than 4K. “The PS5 has 3 modes that all track to a fixed resolution: Fidelity is native 4K, Performance offers 1440p and Performance+ is fixed to 1080p. 1 support, set it to either 4k (2160p) or 1440p, 120Hz on, VRR on, don't apply to unsupported games, and maybe use ALLM. Feb 16, 2025 · To achieve the best possible image quality, the PS5 has to be set to 1440p in the system screen settings and plugged into a native 1440p device, or otherwise it will downsample from 4K and harm pixel quality. Jan 8, 2025 · Are 1440p and 4k the same? No, 1440p and 4K are not the same. What I'm torn about is which to get. 0 is good enough at 4K. 0 displays won't. Vrr works with both resolutions on this monitor. It seems to be split between those who leave it set to 4k60 and those who switch to 1080p120 based on the game they play. If you have a VRR screen, then you can unlock both Fidelity and Performance to 60 or 120fps as a maximum and it is these modes we will compare to the PC. You also have to consider performance, it's way easier to push 1440p 60hz than 4k 60hz, but not as much difference pushing 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz. 4k 60hz uses more bandwidth than 1440p 120hz so technically any adapter that supports 4k60 1440p is a nice step up from 1080p, and the PS5 supports it so you should definitely go for it. I had an asus tuf one before it and there is not much difference: I actually preferred oled colors and black on the LG than having a “crisper” 4k image. I would prefer 1440p 144hz for future PC upgrades, but I'm hesitant to pull the trigger for numerous reasons including whether the downscaled image looks good or not, the likelihood of Sony eventually enabling 1440p on the PS5, and whether the PS5 will even be able to output 4k at > 60hz in the future. FFVII Rebirth PSA: If you limit your PS5 to 1440p output through hardware settings, your picture quality in performance mode is a lot better. If all you're changing is the output resolution on your PS5, then with the following question Some say that playing on 1440 is better because it's less of a strain on my ps5 and that's always been my logic because image quality would logically This may be where the issue lies for me. To clarify, if playing on a 4K screen and have the PS5 set to output at 4K then use “Performance Smooth”. Still looks decent though, can't really tell its not native resolution from a glance but it's really stupid that the console doesn't support 1440p. The other is the LG 27gr93u 27" 4k 144hz. I would recommend to go with 4K 60Hz. 1440p vs 4k is really resolution vs framerate and what GPU you have. But there are newer TVs with VRR which allows variable highest refresh rates pushed at each chosen resolution. 4k is a lot sharper and I really cannot see any pixels or blockiness, where as with 1440p I can see blockiness in things like text and it's nowhere near as sharp. Dont know why i get 30 fps in 1440p quality but it doesnt matter anymore since 1440 perf looks the same and runs at 60. 4K vs. For my overall setup, I use a ps5 and switch along with my pc. Many PS5 games like TLOU2 run at 1440p yet look good on a 4K TV because there is enough resolution for a basic upscale to look good. Game looks pretty nice and runs smoothly so far. I would strongly prefer 60fps as long as it doesn’t absolutely kill the graphics. I thought it was either 1440p OR 4k that could be selected. More important is the color gamut and brightness is more important than the resolution. Not to mention the FPS gains you'll get on PC. 1 unless you want 120 Hz 4K. PS5 does not support VRR at 1440p. I could see some exeptions on overclocked monitors. " In terms of general resolution, primarily on PC, higher is always better but some folks have less discerning eyesight than others and you have to balance other settings to hit a playable framerate so it I can't speak to those exact dimensions. It'd still be a larger percent increase between 4K and 1440p (~45%) at 27" vs 1440p and 1080p (~37%) at 27", but there are also diminishing returns. 32", 4k, 144hz Not the same, but I went from downsampling 4K into 1440p 27” to 32” native 4K. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B. upscaling was made to optimize running lower resolutions on a monitor, it intelligently scales up to the monitor res whereas running a lower resolution as a whole uses simple scaling It's a shame the PS5 does not support 1440p at this time. There is literally no benefit, unless Sony enables native support. I guess it would matter more from 1080 to 1440 but its all preference with HZ difference etc. I have a MSI G272QPF 27" Quad HD 170Hz IPS gaming monitor, so a 1440p monitor. 0 should suit you just fine. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 2023 1440p vs 4k high refresh rates . I heard people say PS5 can use 1440p but I also heard very often that the PS5 is only able to use 1080p or 4k and on a 1440p monitor it is using 1080p. A 1440p/2K monitor using HDMI 2. There are very few native 4K PS5 games especially the newer ones. Despite what others may say, even 4K at 27" is a massive visual upgrade. So that will be my next purchase. Checkerboard 4k is half the pixel count so if game is running 4k 30fps then it can do Checkerboard 4k 60fps ( just going by pixel count). Of course, you'll have to limit some options if you want good 4K fps in the latest games, you'll probably want to steer clear of Ray Tracing and I shouldn't have to say to use DLSS (or other upscaling tools) whenever available, but it's definitely 4K-capable. If you're stuck with a monitor that can only accept signals up to 1440p, the most you can get from a PS5 is 1080p (same goes for HDMI 2. Slightly faster than a 2080 Super. If you can't, wait until you can, then buy one. If you set your display resolución to 1440p,1080 and allow 4k the Xbox will ignore your display settings and will always trigger 4k HDR for 4k HDR compatible games. 3ms, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. 27"/28" is acceptable too. Hi all, so I have two monitors, one being 1440p and the other being 4k, both ips. This at least dulls the problem until we get actual 4K monitors or Sony patches in 1440p native output. Well then that's the huge issue with buying a 1440p for PS5 isn't it. The PS5 supports 1440p displays so most games will output at native 1440p 60 fps at least. Hey everyone, I just recently finished Remake and loved it. thats reddit for you Best Video Cards for 1080p, 1440p, & 4K Sure. 4k is great if you are far enough away, 1440p is better if you are closer to it. Yea for movies,videos, and TV shows…4K is better than 1440p for that. i wanted to use FF16 as a test for this, since i figured going down to the lower res would help performance, but i can't see any discernable improvement to performance in that game. If you are going to be close to the screen, go for a 1440p display. The biggest contributing factors to whether 4K or 1440p looks better is screen size and your distance from the screen. It looks like I’m getting 120fps, but again the graphics just don’t look much different than they did in 1440p. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now as I'm in also considering 4k vs 1440p at27" 120hz Mode on a 1440p monitor with PS5 upvotes The consoles are using TSR Medium with Dynamic 3D Resolution Enabled targeting a reconstructed 4K 60fps. Much more detailed and immersive but horribly aliased by comparison. Remder resolution is seperate from the display resolution. To me, 1440P monitor seems crisper than a 4K tv because the pixels match better. You can set it to 4K/60Hz for most games and it automatically switches to 1440p/120Hz when a game is on high fps mode. Display resolution setting in any Xbox known to man only affects UI and playback compatibility for apps in the system, that's it. FSR 2. You have better image quality than 1080p, high refresh rate which, trust me, is hard to go back to 60hz once you taste 120hz, and it's not as heavy to run as 4k. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub for PS5 & VR2 news and discussion. HDMI 2. It depends on screen size. 1440p, also referred to as QHD, has a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels or 3440 x 1440 pixels. Everything is HDR 4k on this tv. 1 so finding a 1440p display to do VRR on PS5 is hard to find. As an example I had to run FH5 with 4xMSAA to make it acceptable to my eyes. true. 0 TV with high refresh rate. I am using a pair of 43" Toshiba 4k TVs for my PS5 and PS4pro. The monitor will accept 4k image and shrink it to fit 1440p. While many games support a 4k resolution and it will look better than 1440p, the difference isn’t really worth sacrificing a high refresh rate. Games at 4K/30 should be able to run at 1440p/60 fairly easily, with 1080p/60 an absolute certainty. The M28U was a very viable and important option before the impending update to support 1440p. 1 port if u 30 votes, 109 comments. Otherwise it's all 1080p. Then use current TV for another room. 1440p to 4K is not worth the fps loss. It's the perfect sweet spot between 4K and 1080 The monitor itself has a setting to where it can still be set to 4k on each console but I’m pretty sure it’s just downscaled to 1440p. I know on 4k that performance mode is blurry, but I heard on 1440p it’s much better. 4K vs 1440p can either render the same image with finer details or render a larger image with more peripheral details. Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) is a good feature to have 4k is best at 32" and above. From that distance 1440p uw or 1440p 27in would look any less crisp because they both are around 110ppi and that 4k c2 is around 108-109 but smaller res panels would give much higher fps and that snappiness. I wish more games provided a "Console Quality" and "Console Performance" preset. I'm using DLSS instead. There are just as many pricey 1440p monitors. The output res will still be 4k ( if your tv supports it). Best combos of performance and value. I think PS5 actually looks better on a 1440P screen. Im also running a 1440p monitor and I think it's the perfect compromise. But I went from 1440p 27" to a 4k 48" TV and there is a pretty massive difference in quality, you get use to it quickly and it just seems normal after awhile. For xbox, 1440p 120 tv's add a layer of annoyance. 4k 144hz are just to expensive lol. Go with 1440p. Both are the same size at 27". 0 would allow for a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz, but the PS5 will output a max of 120 Hz, and only in compatible games. Also if the game is a ps4 game or something then it might not be 4k but that’s more based on the game than the tv We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The internal resolution is purely dynamic, with the XSX avergaing 59% of 4K and the PS5 averaging 55% of 4K. But on my big living room tv I prefer my ps5 to be on my 4k oled for the exclusives, And occasional multiplat I don't play on PC (elden ring). The image simply has more detail. Not every game supports fsr either mind you. That's nothing to do with the PS5, and everything to do with the monitor - some 1440p monitors will accept a 4k signal and downscale it, but not all. I got this monitor recently so I can see how things look running native 1440p on this monitor vs. Considering 90% of the user base will be using at maximum a 4k 60hz TV/screen, I'd say it's a safe bet to assume a 4k 60hz screen will be the most optimal display for the PS5. 1- PS5 Pro / PS5 at 4K. I see that Alienware is releasing a 1440p and a 4k oled in the beginning of January, along with asus releasing a 4k oled by then as well. About the same results in Forza Motorsport. I play all my single player games on the 4K TV and they look amazing. The big thing I’m stuck between is TV or a monitor? For my price range ($350) I’m stuck deciding between a 43inch 4k 60Hz TV and a 32inch 1440p 120Hz monitor. Also 1440P vs 4K is not that big different than the 144HZ vs 60HZ. Edit : Detroit Being Human looks fantastic! Im mostly playing games with controller lets say witcher 3, rdr2,god of war,ac valhalla and so on. 1. Staggering difference. Should I keep the resolution at auto? (Monitor output shows its 4k in info) or should I set it to 1440p ( monitor output at 1440p in info) What produces the sharper image? I have made 4 screenshots, 1440p quality vs 1440p perf vs 4k quality vs 4k perf. Try to compare similar screen sizes from the same viewing distances. I bought PS5 first then 4K TV. Resolution is one thing but higher quality assest, lightning, performance ray tracing modes and ultra fast load times give you a great experence even with 1080p TV. 25x more pixels Higher refresh rates have a much higher impact IMO. There is no clear answer to that I guess. My monitor is HDMI 2. I have a 32" LG32GN650-B, 27" Gigabyte M27Q, and the Gigabyte M28U and I can promise you that at 28", you aren't going to see any meaningful jumps in clarity and visual fidelity from 1440p to 4k in this screen size and considering the ppi (pixels per inch, pixel density). Fsr upscaled will look better but perform worse. tskwm vewiaoxm rwjal fqbrb dcxw gpvpa uht slcdrw nppul vmyzdnt